Topic: Pluto Moves to Aquarius! BIG changes!
Reply
SparklingCrystal ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ’Ž's photo

SparklingCrystal ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ’Ž

Wed 03/08/23 03:35 AM

A lot to read, but well worth it! Such important and positive news!

March 23rd 2023 itโ€™s finally going to happen: Pluto is moving from Capricorn into Aquarius for the first time since Dec 1778!
The planet of transformation, life & death & rebirth, cycles, moves into the sign that is all about innovation, equality, uniqueness, freedom, and revolution.
If a planet takes 15-20 years to move through a sign (which Pluto does) it means that a huge collective change is coming. Maybe this can already be seen in the world (in March) as much is going on concerning power & powerless, shadow & light, lie & truth.
Pluto goes to the bottom and leaves no stone unturned.



Although Pluto is about collective changes, it is also โ€“as always- about examining yourself. What is suppressed will surface, so self-examination and dis-covering what you do not allow yourself to be, do, or live, is a prerequisite (in order to feel free).
If you donโ€™t do this, skip this step, you will end up pointing fingers and regard everything outside of yourself as โ€œthe enemyโ€.
What does your soul want to live? Which love do you give and do you need?
Pluto isnโ€™t just the planet of crisis, fear, death & transformation, but also of love, being true to your soul and becoming aware of your divine being.
After a moment of crisis you often find/retrieve an important (soul) part, move into another direction, but you must let go of something and that hurt.
The better you know and understand yourself, know both your light & your shadow, the swifter you recognise, live through and endure difficult situations.

Take this entire process โ€“maybe read it a 2nd time- and then think of how this would work on a much larger scale as the exact same will (have to) happen globally!
When you put that process as a kind of layer over the world you will see that it then becomes very complex as many people are involved! Just take the part ".... regard everything outside as the enemy" and what that could mean on a global scale!
Nevertheless the same goes on this large scale: what is suppressed and/or kept hidden in the dark will surface. And that can stir up a lot.
The ruling planet of Aquarius โ€“the sign Pluto moves into- is Uranus, so themes of freedom, equality, freedom of choice, living-together, but when these are challenged there can also be revolution and struggle.
Both pros and cons of technology as hidden components within technological innovation will come to light more and more.
Who wants to see will see. We live on a planet of free will, so know you can choose where you direct your attention & energy and what you cover and dis-cover.

Bear in mind this is a long process as Pluto will be in Aquarius for 15-20 years!!
And until somewhere next year, 2024, Pluto will briefly move back into Capricorn twice. So likely the start will be a bit wobbly, like an engine needing time to get warm before it runs smoothly.
Personally I feel this is all great news! When I first read it all I felt was relief and a โ€œFINALLY!!!โ€

Source: Petrastam.com
Translation and last paragraph: me

Edited by SparklingCrystal ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ’Ž on Wed 03/08/23 03:37 AM
Duttoneer's photo

Duttoneer

Fri 03/10/23 01:41 AM

Interesting read, but I guess it's whether you believe in Astrology or not, it's not a science.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-astrology-real-heres-what-science-says/#:~:text=Astrology%20is%20founded%20on%20understanding,None%20whatsoever.
(you may need to paste this in to your browser)

Says,

"About a third of Americans believe astrology is "very" or "sort of scientific." But does being a Pisces, Virgo rising really matter in the eyes of science?"

"Clearly, lots of people are looking for ways to interpret the stars for advice. Astrology is founded on understanding the positions of the stars, which seems like a scientific enough pursuit in itself. But is there any science to back up whether astrology impacts our personality and our lives?"

"Hereโ€™s the short Answer: No. None whatsoever."
Edited by Duttoneer on Fri 03/10/23 02:00 AM
SparklingCrystal ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ’Ž's photo

SparklingCrystal ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ’Ž

Fri 03/10/23 02:35 AM


Interesting read, but I guess it's whether you believe in Astrology or not, it's not a science.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-astrology-real-heres-what-science-says/#:~:text=Astrology%20is%20founded%20on%20understanding,None%20whatsoever.
(you may need to paste this in to your browser)

Says,

"About a third of Americans believe astrology is "very" or "sort of scientific." But does being a Pisces, Virgo rising really matter in the eyes of science?"

"Clearly, lots of people are looking for ways to interpret the stars for advice. Astrology is founded on understanding the positions of the stars, which seems like a scientific enough pursuit in itself. But is there any science to back up whether astrology impacts our personality and our lives?"

"Hereโ€™s the short Answer: No. None whatsoever."

Science relies on means & methods that aren't capable of doing the job, yet. Those means need to get developed, upgraded and so on while they do their research, meaning it's very unreliable. It often takes decades for those methods & means to be good enough to get good measurements or whatever it is science needs.
As such science always lags behind and is very fallible.
Yet, while they themselves fall short with their abilities, they reject everything they cannot proof. Pretty much like someone that doesn't know how to operate a kitchen faucet and then declares "There is no water!"
Unfortunately there are people that make science their god & gauge and thus they're also lagging behind and not living the truth.

Did you know a great many things that science used to say were 'the truth' have now been proven wrong by science itself? In spite of that children are still taught their old stories at school? So the heads of our offspring are being filled with utter bullcrap!

Thank goodness certain branches of science, like epigenetics, are getting with the times so it starts to do what science is supposed to do: serve mankind as opposed to limit us.
Edited by SparklingCrystal ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ’Ž on Fri 03/10/23 02:37 AM
Duttoneer's photo

Duttoneer

Fri 03/10/23 03:50 AM

It goes on to say,

"Astrology is generally defined as the belief that astronomical phenomena, like the stars overhead when you were born or the fact that opens in a new windowMercury is in retrograde, have the power to influence the daily events in our lives and our personality traits. This is, of course, very different from the study of astronomy, which is the scientific study of celestial objects, space, and the physics of the universe."

"Astrology fails to predict life event outcomes any better than chance. It also fails to provide a mechanism by which it could work. What exactly is the connection between the stars overhead when you were born and whether or not you should make big decisions in the summer? My searches for any such explanations came up empty."

It seems to me it comes down to what you are prepared or want to believe.
pumpilicious ๐Ÿ’•'s photo

pumpilicious ๐Ÿ’•

Fri 03/10/23 07:30 AM

I am VERY intrigued & tysm for posting this Crystal. I've been feeling something & hope everything you say comes to pass.

In response to the last post...
Ofc it does come down to what you are open to accept. I've done a lot of reading on this because I had never truly believed it until I researched the different signs & compared them irl to people I know and love. Guess what? what is said about each sign and how each interacts with each other, is pretty damn close to what i experience and witnessed. Imo that is not just random.

I'm a show me person, proof is what I see personally to be true.
If that is true, it stands to reason planet alignment is true & not some made up fantasies.

Thanks again Crystal flowerforyou
SparklingCrystal ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ’Ž's photo

SparklingCrystal ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ’Ž

Fri 03/10/23 07:58 AM


It goes on to say,

"Astrology is generally defined as the belief that astronomical phenomena, like the stars overhead when you were born or the fact that opens in a new windowMercury is in retrograde, have the power to influence the daily events in our lives and our personality traits. This is, of course, very different from the study of astronomy, which is the scientific study of celestial objects, space, and the physics of the universe."

"Astrology fails to predict life event outcomes any better than chance. It also fails to provide a mechanism by which it could work. What exactly is the connection between the stars overhead when you were born and whether or not you should make big decisions in the summer? My searches for any such explanations came up empty."

It seems to me it comes down to what you are prepared or want to believe.

Can you please stick to the subject which is "Pluto is going to move into Aquarius", or if that's not your thing just forego it. This is NOT an "is astrology true or not" discussion.
SparklingCrystal ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ’Ž's photo

SparklingCrystal ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ’Ž

Fri 03/10/23 07:59 AM


I am VERY intrigued & tysm for posting this Crystal. I've been feeling something & hope everything you say comes to pass.

In response to the last post...
Ofc it does come down to what you are open to accept. I've done a lot of reading on this because I had never truly believed it until I researched the different signs & compared them irl to people I know and love. Guess what? what is said about each sign and how each interacts with each other, is pretty damn close to what i experience and witnessed. Imo that is not just random.

I'm a show me person, proof is what I see personally to be true.
If that is true, it stands to reason planet alignment is true & not some made up fantasies.

Thanks again Crystal flowerforyou

You're welcome!
It feels absolutely positive to me, this shifting into Aquarius! Truly part of our ascension process :)
Duttoneer's photo

Duttoneer

Sat 03/11/23 02:58 AM


I am VERY intrigued & tysm for posting this Crystal. I've been feeling something & hope everything you say comes to pass.

In response to the last post...
Ofc it does come down to what you are open to accept. I've done a lot of reading on this because I had never truly believed it until I researched the different signs & compared them irl to people I know and love. Guess what? what is said about each sign and how each interacts with each other, is pretty damn close to what i experience and witnessed. Imo that is not just random.

I'm a show me person, proof is what I see personally to be true.
If that is true, it stands to reason planet alignment is true & not some made up fantasies.

Thanks again Crystal flowerforyou


@ pumpilicious, you say conducted a very small comparison test which seemed to support the conjecture, " I researched the different signs & compared them irl to people I know and love. Guess what? what is said about each sign and how each interacts with each other, is pretty damn close to what i experience and witnessed. Imo that is not just random."

Statistics is a mathematical science, well founded in mathematical theory, and here are the results of one test carried out in1985, taken from the above mentioned website report, a much larger test than the one you did and professionally carried out as explained below.

"In 1985, physicist Shawn Carlson conducted a double-blind test of the idea that astrological charts could accurately describe our personality traits and published his results in the journal Nature.

Carlson asked 30 American and European astrologers, ranked by their peers as among the best, to review the astrological charts for 116 people without meeting them in person. He then provided three personality descriptions for each of the 116 people. One description was the one that actually described the subject. The other two were real personality descriptions โ€ฆ but they described other people. Carlson asked the astrologers to match the right personality with the personโ€™s astrological chart.

Overall, the astrologers matched one in three charts correctly, so their results were no better than they would be based on random chance.

The result? The astrologers were only able to make the correct match one-third of the time. In other words, given three personality descriptions for a subject, youโ€™d have a one in three chance of picking the right one. Overall, the astrologers matched one in three charts correctly, so their results were no better than they would be based on random chance."

This isn't proof, but it supports my belief, that my life and my future are not written in the stars.
SparklingCrystal ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ’Ž's photo

SparklingCrystal ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ’Ž

Sat 03/11/23 03:15 AM

The other day I looked into my own Pluto, which was in Virgo at the time of my birth. Before that it was in Leo for 20 yrs approx.
The article explained the interpretation of that all against the setting of those times. Really SO interesting!!

Pluto in any sign represents our collective soul purpose: a mostly unconscious process that leads us -as a generation - to compulsively and habitually approach certain aspects of life in a similar way, as described by the sign Pluto was transiting when we were all born.

It all makes so much sense when you read that.
And now, with Pluto moving into Aquarius, another very important setting begins, as explained in my OP.
Aquarius is closely connected or representative of the times to come as that is The Age of Aquarius.

I love that astrology shows all these tendencies!


Here's the link to that article, if interested. It tells about the setting of the time when Pluto was in Leo and after that in Virgo. Many of us here were born in either one of those. It explains the setting and meaning of it, illustrating that collective Soul purpose & lessons.
https://medium.com/astrolab21/collective-souls-the-pluto-in-virgo-generation-b8cefef5a0da
Edited by SparklingCrystal ๐Ÿ’–๐Ÿ’Ž on Sat 03/11/23 03:24 AM
Duttoneer's photo

Duttoneer

Sat 03/11/23 03:16 AM



It goes on to say,

"Astrology is generally defined as the belief that astronomical phenomena, like the stars overhead when you were born or the fact that opens in a new windowMercury is in retrograde, have the power to influence the daily events in our lives and our personality traits. This is, of course, very different from the study of astronomy, which is the scientific study of celestial objects, space, and the physics of the universe."

"Astrology fails to predict life event outcomes any better than chance. It also fails to provide a mechanism by which it could work. What exactly is the connection between the stars overhead when you were born and whether or not you should make big decisions in the summer? My searches for any such explanations came up empty."

It seems to me it comes down to what you are prepared or want to believe.

Can you please stick to the subject which is "Pluto is going to move into Aquarius", or if that's not your thing just forego it. This is NOT an "is astrology true or not" discussion.



Whatever the planet Pluto is doing, I don't expect it to have any influence on my life or on my future. Astrology has no basis in science in my opinion, and is not my thing.
pumpilicious ๐Ÿ’•'s photo

pumpilicious ๐Ÿ’•

Sat 03/11/23 06:59 AM



I am VERY intrigued & tysm for posting this Crystal. I've been feeling something & hope everything you say comes to pass.

In response to the last post...
Ofc it does come down to what you are open to accept. I've done a lot of reading on this because I had never truly believed it until I researched the different signs & compared them irl to people I know and love. Guess what? what is said about each sign and how each interacts with each other, is pretty damn close to what i experience and witnessed. Imo that is not just random.

I'm a show me person, proof is what I see personally to be true.
If that is true, it stands to reason planet alignment is true & not some made up fantasies.

Thanks again Crystal flowerforyou


@ pumpilicious, you say conducted a very small comparison test which seemed to support the conjecture, " I researched the different signs & compared them irl to people I know and love. Guess what? what is said about each sign and how each interacts with each other, is pretty damn close to what i experience and witnessed. Imo that is not just random."

Statistics is a mathematical science, well founded in mathematical theory, and here are the results of one test carried out in1985, taken from the above mentioned website report, a much larger test than the one you did and professionally carried out as explained below.

"In 1985, physicist Shawn Carlson conducted a double-blind test of the idea that astrological charts could accurately describe our personality traits and published his results in the journal Nature.

Carlson asked 30 American and European astrologers, ranked by their peers as among the best, to review the astrological charts for 116 people without meeting them in person. He then provided three personality descriptions for each of the 116 people. One description was the one that actually described the subject. The other two were real personality descriptions โ€ฆ but they described other people. Carlson asked the astrologers to match the right personality with the personโ€™s astrological chart.

Overall, the astrologers matched one in three charts correctly, so their results were no better than they would be based on random chance.

The result? The astrologers were only able to make the correct match one-third of the time. In other words, given three personality descriptions for a subject, youโ€™d have a one in three chance of picking the right one. Overall, the astrologers matched one in three charts correctly, so their results were no better than they would be based on random chance."

This isn't proof, but it supports my belief, that my life and my future are not written in the stars.

again, perception & you're obviously not accepting it could be possible. Also,
I've had my chart done & it had me to a T. That is not coincidental.

This isn't proof, but it supports my belief, that my life and my future are are written in the stars.

Idk why you felt the need to respond, when the OP asked you to stay on subject. If we wanted to debate if astrology exists, we would start that thread.

Good day sir.
Edited by pumpilicious ๐Ÿ’• on Sat 03/11/23 07:55 AM
Duttoneer's photo

Duttoneer

Sat 03/11/23 07:41 AM




I am VERY intrigued & tysm for posting this Crystal. I've been feeling something & hope everything you say comes to pass.

In response to the last post...
Ofc it does come down to what you are open to accept. I've done a lot of reading on this because I had never truly believed it until I researched the different signs & compared them irl to people I know and love. Guess what? what is said about each sign and how each interacts with each other, is pretty damn close to what i experience and witnessed. Imo that is not just random.

I'm a show me person, proof is what I see personally to be true.
If that is true, it stands to reason planet alignment is true & not some made up fantasies.

Thanks again Crystal flowerforyou


@ pumpilicious, you say conducted a very small comparison test which seemed to support the conjecture, " I researched the different signs & compared them irl to people I know and love. Guess what? what is said about each sign and how each interacts with each other, is pretty damn close to what i experience and witnessed. Imo that is not just random."

Statistics is a mathematical science, well founded in mathematical theory, and here are the results of one test carried out in1985, taken from the above mentioned website report, a much larger test than the one you did and professionally carried out as explained below.

"In 1985, physicist Shawn Carlson conducted a double-blind test of the idea that astrological charts could accurately describe our personality traits and published his results in the journal Nature.

Carlson asked 30 American and European astrologers, ranked by their peers as among the best, to review the astrological charts for 116 people without meeting them in person. He then provided three personality descriptions for each of the 116 people. One description was the one that actually described the subject. The other two were real personality descriptions โ€ฆ but they described other people. Carlson asked the astrologers to match the right personality with the personโ€™s astrological chart.

Overall, the astrologers matched one in three charts correctly, so their results were no better than they would be based on random chance.

The result? The astrologers were only able to make the correct match one-third of the time. In other words, given three personality descriptions for a subject, youโ€™d have a one in three chance of picking the right one. Overall, the astrologers matched one in three charts correctly, so their results were no better than they would be based on random chance."

This isn't proof, but it supports my belief, that my life and my future are not written in the stars.

again, perception & you're obviously not accepting it could be possible. Also,
I've had my chart done & it had me to a T. That is not coincidental.

This isn't proof, but it supports my belief, that my life and my future are are written in the stars.

Idk why felt the need to respond, when the OP asked you to stay on subject. If we wanted to debate if astrology exists, we would start that thread.

Good day sir.



Clearly you are believer. I have no wish to offend anyone, but what was first posted by the OP has no basis in fact, which was the point I was making. Other points of view are allowed here in Mingle2.
Mr Gus non clotshot's photo

Mr Gus non clotshot

Tue 03/28/23 02:44 PM

if consciousness skynet is received, from the cosmos and gravity affects energy and behaviour...when you have various rotational gravity's around you at birth of course its going to affect you
Duttoneer's photo

Duttoneer

Wed 03/29/23 03:52 AM



Mike6615's photo

Mike6615

Wed 03/29/23 06:54 AM

Well, I guess we're not in The Age of Aquarius anymore...
Duttoneer's photo

Duttoneer

Wed 03/29/23 08:13 AM


I don't know, but since you asked you will no doubt receive a response from our resident astrologer on here.