I've talked about this subject before and know that some here have actually had jury duty.
We do not have that system here -thank goodness!- although it's under constant debate whether or not it should be implemented. I'm not pro-jury system.
Now what I'd like to know... does it really go like this, like what I saw in a series the other day:
jury coming together first time, a number of them asking "shall we vote him guilty?" This was before trial had even started so it wasn't based on anything other than them wanting to be done with jury duty.
"I have a job and I cannot be away for long. I'll lose my job." and similar arguments.
Basically having no problem with sending someone to jail, not even giving him/her a fair trial just because they're selfish and want it over with.
I must say over here people wouldn't lose their jobs as you cannot get the sack just like that. An employer needs a very good reason to fire someone and unless you've committed a serious offense it's almost impossible. Employees are protected very well over here.
But I do get you get less pay during jury duty?
Personally I think it's insane that you can get fired for doing your duty by serving on a jury.
In any case, what I'd like to know... does it really happen that a jury just wants/tries to reach a verdict among themselves before trial has even begun just so they can go home sooner?
Upload photo
Would you look at a profile that doesn't have photos?
Probably not! Upload a photo for others to be interested.
- Higher position in search results!
- Users with pictures get 10 times more responses in their messages
- Most people only contact those with pictures
Jenny
Lina
Anna
Jessica
Dony