If you don't follow or believe in our Constitution you should not be aloud in our government PERIOD

too late for most countries.... by the look of things world over .... better vetting is definitely required IMO

Amen broother

Many elected morons have never even read
the document they pledged to uphold and
defend.

Sounds like a treat.

Sounds like a threat.

It's too bad J Biden and his administration don't believe that! Oh and add B Obama too!

I can't think of any examples of Biden stepping outside his powers defined in Article 2. Can you? Please explain how you interpret the constitution such that Biden (or even Obama) has disregarded it.

It would seem that way. A good bit of them took Constutional Law tho too

How is that a threat?

Amen he has broken so many laws, ignored our Constitution, told our Supreme Court I don't care what you say. He admitted extortion of the Ukrainian government on international TV

Let me guess but oh Trump did right Mortman
Lmao
Biden is the biggest traitor to our country, our Constitution, our people, that has ever been in office. Obuttwipe is a close 2nd. Hell just Bidens actions with our boarder is a violation of our Constitution. The Supreme Court even ruled he was in violation of our Constitution and laws on his boarder policies and he gave them the finger. Propaganda that

Do your research.

Amen sister toodygirl 5

I can't think of any examples of Biden stepping outside his powers defined in Article 2. Can you? Please explain how you interpret the constitution such that Biden (or even Obama) has disregarded it.



Do your research.

So you couldn't find anything either? Thought not.

I saw a story about a federal judge in Texas who claims Biden is violating the 1st Amendment when members in his cabinet asked certain social media sites to take down false and misleading information regarding Covid 19. I guess one could interpret that to mean it's the government censoring citizens, but it looks to me that the government has the right to ask sites to exercise their own standards on any post thereon. Like if I ask Facebook to take down some information I find that violates their terms of service (TOS), doesn't make that censorship on my part. Just pointing out a post that violates TOS. Anybody who posts to a social network is not guaranteed the right to have their post remain up regardless of it's violating nature. Of course the Trump-appointed judge disagrees because it doesn't fit his narrative. He wants posts that degrade the Democratic politicians programs. He wants to remove Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act rescinded for the same reason, but this doesn't make any of the issue unconstitutional.

https://www.penncapital-star.com/uncategorized/did-the-biden-administration-violate-the-first-amendment/

What have you got?

How about Biden giving authorization to the CDC to put a moratorium on evictions during the pandemic , or his unconstitutional act of trying to suspend the paying back of student loans. Here is two of the examples that Biden is going around the constitution… and yes his asking of social media to withhold info that sheds a light on his corruption is unconstitutional… for Obamas unconstitutional act it was Obamacare.

Do your research.

So you couldn't find anything either? Thought not.

I saw a story about a federal judge in Texas who claims Biden is violating the 1st Amendment when members in his cabinet asked certain social media sites to take down false and misleading information regarding Covid 19. I guess one could interpret that to mean it's the government censoring citizens, but it looks to me that the government has the right to ask sites to exercise their own standards on any post thereon. Like if I ask Facebook to take down some information I find that violates their terms of service (TOS), doesn't make that censorship on my part. Just pointing out a post that violates TOS. Anybody who posts to a social network is not guaranteed the right to have their post remain up regardless of it's violating nature. Of course the Trump-appointed judge disagrees because it doesn't fit his narrative. He wants posts that degrade the Democratic politicians programs. He wants to remove Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act rescinded for the same reason, but this doesn't make any of the issue unconstitutional.

https://www.penncapital-star.com/uncategorized/did-the-biden-administration-violate-the-first-amendment/

What have you got?


You do know you're part of the 20% of Americans who believe these treasonous lies. Anyone with half a brain can see Biden is corrupted by foreign money to run this country into the ground. Biden is and anyone who supports him is too.

You forgot to mention the covid speech he suppressed was true and would've killed his and big pharmaceuticals agenda

None of that garbage was true. There are real, clinical studies proving effectiveness of the Covid vaccines and all the studies for Ivermectin showed either inconclusive or it being completely worthless in actual use against Covid. Usually it caused intestinal damage--especially in the dosages those idiots recommended.

Also, it wasn't "suppressed speech" as much as dangerous misinformation. And nobody complained when they asked Facebook and TikTok to take down the Tide Pod Challenge videos.

Studies, speeches, opinions and the like don't mean much to me, mostly because so much of it turns out to be crap, especially from the liberal side. But I can speak from personal experience on Ivermectin. It actually works, especially when taken at the first sign of COVID symptoms. And usually I don't mind hearing thoughts from all sides but on this issue I really don't need a libs opinion. Thanks in advance.