Abra said:
I don't see why religions need to be recognized by the government at all.
One reason the government needs to recognize a religion is because they are supposed to allow people to worship freely and have freedom of religion and sometimes a law could interfere with that.
Native Americans are allowed to own eagle feathers for the purpose of their religious beliefs but if you get caught with eagle feathers or any feathers of a wild bird and you are not a native American using them for religious purposes, then you have broken the law.
The religious practices of the native Americans were in existence before the laws were made to protect the eagles and wild birds so they have the right to keep their practice in tact. But you can't just create a new "religion" today whose practices would be against current statutes.
Abra said:
Like I say, if they want to create a non-profit humanitarian effort, then that would be ok, but they should also be made to have that open to everyone in order to qualify for the tax exemption.
Anyone can have a non-profit corporation, but it must follow certain guidelines. The non-profit status is simply a way to make and use money that is tax exempt.
If you are operating a group that makes money and you do not pay taxes on that money and you are not registered as a legal non-profit organization with the government, then you are in violation of statutes. You (or your group or church) are also not recognized as a legal entity.
Why should the government endorse religions of any kind?
The government does not endorse "religions." Churches are corporations. They are usually registered as non-profit so they don't have to pay taxes on income generated.
A belief system is not always a "religion." A belief system does not have to be registered as a corporation or pay taxes.
It is only when you acquire members and start collecting dues and generating income that you are required to register as a business or non-profit. If you do not, then you are operating illegally. It is not wise to be a member of such a group because you are not protected against fraud. The group leader could easily steal all the funds.
Instead of religions competing for governmental recognition they should just all be viewed as a private organizations that have nothing to do with government.
Religions don't "compete" for governmental recognition. If you are a church you must be a corporation. You don't HAVE to be a non-profit corporation, (but you will have to pay taxes on income if you are NOT a non-profit corporation.)
Any "church" that is not a corporation is just a group of people who have a belief system.
It is when that group gets a bank account (or a piggy bank) and starts to make money, that it needs to become a legal entity or corporation. This is also for the protection of the members in the group. It can help prevent the leader (or high priestess) from absconding with the funds with no paper trail to prove anything.
A "private organization" is either a company, partnership, corporation or association. All of these entities are registered with the government, state or federal.
Anything not registered is not a legal "entity" and does not officially exist except as a "secret society" or private club or group.
Abra said:
The government as a whole should not support any religion and that includes atheism. To not support religion is not the same as denying spirituality or gods. It's just claiming to not support any spiritual belief or even non-belief.
That's the way it should be. It should be a complete non-issue when it comes to government. It's just not up to the government to support or reject spirituality. It's just not necessary for government to do that.
The government (our government) doesn't give a rats ass about religion and does not support or endorse it. All it cares about is Law, taxes, and money.
Edited by
Jeanniebean
on Sun 10/26/08 08:45 AM