The reason studying Wicca is good for modern day witches trying to learn the craft is because the information and rituals are easily accessible through current books. There are no books written by the witches of yesteryear that we can look at now to learn. These traditions were generally passed down orally. Wicca has carried on with some of these traditions and while it has become a religion, it is useful to learn about it in order to practice witchcraft.
I agree with you to an extent. And I certainly like Scott Cunningham's books. He presents the ideas with very much abstraction which I totally support.
However, there seems to be a bit of a contradition here,...
Scott's book is entitled: Wicca: A Guide for the Solitary practictioner.
He doesn't meantion anything about the need to be initiated by any recognized High Preistess (at least I haven't seen that yet, I haven't finished reading the entire book, but the very title suggest a
solitary practictioner.
Doesn't that fly in the face of Wicca then as an organized religion which one must be initiated into?
Shouldn't Scott's book truly be entitled, "Natural Witchcraft for the Non-Wiccan"?
He sure seems to be coming across as supporting a completely personal abstract interpretation of witchcraft in what I've read thus far.
I don't see this as necessarily supporting an organized religion called 'Wicca'.
So there seems to be a very fine line between the organized religion, and a purely personal dedication to the craft without affiliating oneself with an organized religion.
I wouldn't want to be in Lily shoes and have to describe where the line is.
Unless it's as simple as you say. In order to be an 'official Wiccan' you must be initiated into the specific religion designed by Gerald Gardner in or around 1940.
If that's what is required to become a 'Wiccan' then owl just be a Natural Witch.
Aaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
cackle cackle cackle
:rides off into the moonset on his magick broom: