Ruth,
Well, for whatever it's worth, you played a major role in helping me to discover the truths in this ritual religious system. From having read your posts in the General Religions Forum I felt that you had established your sanity and it was because of this I put great merit in the books that you had recommended.
I had been studying the religions of Eastern Mysticism, specifically the various forms of Buddhism. I found modern Zen Buddhism to be nothing more than a glorified system of atheism (at least as presented by many people). However, I found the more ancient forms of Buddhism to be more spiritually oriented. Theravada Buddhism was the original form created by Siddhartha Gutama. While interesting, it seemed to also be lacking in areas. A slightly more modern version of Buddhism called Mahayana Buddhism seemed far more spiritual to me. This is the form of Buddhism that Jesus may have learned about. It focused on the concept of the bodhisattva, and even demanded that it's practitioners swear an oath to become a bodhisattva before being permitted to become a monk. I find it quite interesting that Jesus was indeed the ultimate bodhisattva.
In any case, even though I found Mahayana Buddhism to be attractive in many ways, it still seemed to be lacking that direct connection with spirit (as least in my mind). However the Mahayana Buddhism of India also became entangled with Taoism from China. From that arose a new form of Buddhism called Tantric Buddhism. The concept of sacred circles also came into the picture. This of course lead me directly to pure Taoism which has its roots in Shamanism. Shamanism finally struck a cord with me and I found something that I could genuinely identify with.
I hope all this isn't boring you, I'll get to witchcraft eventually, I promise.
In the meantime, I was very lucky to stumble onto the teachings of the great guru Deepak Chopra. I've purchased many of this lectures on video including a 7-hour actual course on spiritual enlightenment. One of the things that Deepak clarified for me is the concept of "archetypes". Archetypes (as it applies to these spiritual traditions) is simply the mythological vehicle through which an individual soul creates a means of communiqué with the cosmic consciousness (or God if you like). Deepak's view is far from atheistic and clearly based on a belief in a higher divine consciousness.
Even so, there was an element missing from this practice. Although, perhaps I shouldn't say that it was 'missing', it was there, it just wasn't well-defined, and they reason was that this element can't be well-defined in general because it must necessarily be a personal choice. At that element is, of course, the choice of archetypal communiqué.
This was the part where my childhood religion had failed me miserably. As you well know, I was born and raised as a Christian. However, the archetype for that religion had been grossly tainted for me, partly due to the mythology itself (demanding that every has already fallen from grace and is in the dog house with God). And the whole thesis of the religion was the need to repent and to shun the material world as being the domain of Satan. Not to mention the fact, that the only way to get back into grace with this horrible God was to confess that you're guilty of forcing him to have his son Jesus nailed to a pole to pay for your disgusting worthless behavior. The whole religion was just focused on guilt, shame, and the shunning of the material world with belongs to some evil demon named Satin. It's just a horrible archetype to be used as a means of communiqué with the divine mind. (at least from my point of view).
None the less, that religion is still considered to be a valid religious "archetype". And many people have been brainwashed to believe that if you don't accept it you'll be shunned by the supreme consciousness and cast into a place of eternal damnation. It's just not my cup of tea and never truly worked for me at all.
However, Deepak had mentioned other archetypes such as Greek Mythology, American Indian Traditions, and other traditions from northern Europe (I don't think he wanted to mention witchcraft specifically due to the mainstream rejection of these religious practices as nothing more than ignorant fairytales at best, or the work of that nasty Satan at worst).
In any case, I realized that I needed a vehicle of communiqué with the cosmic consciousness. Ironically that's what Mahayana (from Mahayana Buddhism) means "The Great Vehicle".
So anyway, I had always been interested in witchcraft traditions, as well as faery folklore. But in, in truth, I had difficulty in seeing either of them as "valid genuine religions". No doubt due to my history of having been raised in a society that basically teaches that such things are worthless fairytales at best, or the work of Satan at worst.
In any case, when you introduced me to the book by Scott Cunningham, and then utliamate to the books of Christopher Penczak all that changed. I realized that people do take these traditions seriously, and that they have cultural merit in the cosmic scheme of things. And I also realized that not only are they not the work of any "Satan" but in truth such an evil demon would be the antithesis of any genuinely all-powerful supreme being anyway. In other words, I have now come to the profound realization that it was Christianity all along that is the utterly absurd fairytale that has no merit, not the other way around.
So now I have accepted various Celtic Traditions as having great merit. I have no problem integrating various archetypes together. So I have combined the various Gods and Goddesses of the witchcraft traditions along with the faery lore. I simple prefer to hang out with the fairies instead of the angels. They are both mythological creatures that have wings and fly. But the fairies are far more inviting to me. I hang out with groups of them at a time in my shamanism journey. They are more child-like than the angels and far more fun to be around.
So I've incorporated the faery legends into my spiritual archetype seamlessly. They work right in very easily because of the four faery cities of Falias, Gorias, Finias, and Murias that are associated with the four points of the compass. They are my "angles".
Learning about how to accept archetypes and incorporate them successfully as a vehicle of communiqué with the cosmic consciousness was the major key that really broke things wide open for me.
Ok, this was another widly expanded ramble. But the point I originally wanted to make was that my respect for you sanity was what caused me to go ahead and order over $100 worth of witchcraft books by Christopher Penczak, and trust me, it was the best $100 I ever spent! Of course I probably spent as much on Chopra videos too.

But they too were well worth the price! Chopra and Penczak are basically saying the same things. They are just coming at it from two different cultural directions.
So now my spiritual rituals are a combination of traditions from various spiritualities, including witchcraft, the concept of the Moon Goddess, the Sun God, the Faery Teachings, along with some elements of ancient aspects of Buddhism and Taoism, also some magickal teachings from Egypt and the Qabalah (with a Celtic twist). Even Jesus is included in my spiritual archetype. I see him as having been a victim of the very religion that preaches in his name. He was a great bodhisattva who paid a high price to help others find their way.
Well, I better go do something productive today.
Thanks for starting a thread on a topic I can relate to.
Systems of magick (or spiritual communiqué) is important. I personally feel that the most important aspect of it is that you find something that truly works for you. And don't worry about having to defend it to anyone else. It's between you and your creator. No one else even needs to know about it, unless you decide to share it with people who are genuinely interested.
Just ignore the naysayers. Let them deal with their spirituality, and you deal with yours. You don't need to justify yourself to anyone other than the cosmic consciousness that you are reaching out to. And the mere fact that you're reaching out says volumes.