Well, with a debt of 20 Trillion, everything needs to be re-evaluated for cost(including fraud) and on results. The longer that government programs exist they tend to get corrupted.

true, nothing that involves humans will ever be perfect

I think the way to reduce reactionary costs, is to invest more in precautionary costs

meaning , we have to spend less to help people recover, if we invest more in developing them in the first place


better education and career opportunities,,,,more hope and more support to prevent things from going haywire, decreases the cost of fixing things after they go haywire

agreed, the idea is to reduce the need for aid in the first place.

Yes, to be clear here, I'm not suggesting taking it away. I'm simply saying get everyone to re-apply for coverage, preferably after their last welfare check.

Suppose I was paid on May 1st for a welfare check. (which will never freaking happen, because I have no desire to ever sponge off this government). With that check would come an application to re-apply, which as I recall requires financial documents, expense sheets, etc.

Unless I filled out the forms, dotted the i's and crossed the t's, I would not receive another check on June 1st. =)

they do that already,, yearly reviews of finances, employment,,,etc

You can spin it anyway you like MS... you are very predictable.. very X. Head in the sand.


back atcha!!!!

we see what we choose to,, tunelvision is not reality,,,,pay closer attention white folks are killing white folks too

not all cops are bad cops just cause that's what the tv shows



and crime is not some 'black' phenomenon because that's what you 'see on tv'

all groups , ALL GROUPS, have people who do good and people who don't


including the usual people that people love to hate,, like NOI and FArrakhan

......

I'm enjoying the more productive conversation on welfare now,,,,,