depends on which protests we are talking about?

I just finished explaining

Protesting for change is productive and necessary

Protesting because one doesn't like the democratically elected president is a waste of time, resources and most are not productive people.


I personally believe that occupy wall street protesters aren't productive.

I personally believe the protests in Baltimore, Ferguson, Oakland were far from productive, I dont call burning down buildings, looting, stealing and turning over and setting ablaze police cars as productive, unless you mean productive for the police force giving them overtime.

productive people earn a living, contribute to society in many ways.

folks sitting on their duffs collecting welfare, or those unemployed out protesting Trump isn't productive.

Unless I'm missing something?

Even if we stick to the topic of Trump and media, the media today isn't productive.

HAAAAAAAAA,, you have had SO MANY EXPERIENCES

SHE didnt have kids, people who RENT an apartment (single people without kids) dont have alot of lawn to keep. Which meant she was cooking, cleaning, and doing laundry for ONE. how much time do you think that took on average on a DAILY Basis?


and I dont know when THIS experience happened, but a research of paralegal pay is easy enough to search

and being that I WENT to paralegal school AND graduated back in the 90s and starting pay was more than ten THEN,

Im doubting this is more than either a factor of an outlier in a place with very low cost of living, or a deception

but in either case, for a paralegal, the pay at the lower end is 30,000.

and 14 an hour IS PLENTY to support one person, unless ... well, never mind

where I stay, rent (one bedroom) is 900 per month, if you put 400 for a car/insurance, 250 for food, and 200 for utilities, and 200 for gas a month. that is only 1950 a month ONE PERSON would need.

which is why that type of one person salary is not 'food stamp' eligible.


people who understand math, know what it takes too ...

and it is BAT **** CRAZY that how much someone earns should have ANYTHING to do with whether they should be able to attend WHATEVER free event they choose, let alone whether their murder is therefore somehow their fault for not happening to be at a job in that moment.

You have her paying almost nothing in taxes. $62 a week in groceries lol My grocery trip includes soap, shampoo, feminine products, cleaning supplies, toothpaste, deodorant, toilet paper, laundry detergent. Tide is almost $12. That budget is unrealistic. The $400 would most likely only cover the car. Insurance would be $100-$300 more. The utilities would be correct without WiFi, phone, or satellite.

She got to be there alright.

what you've posted makes no sense , Im sorry if that seems rude

Conflating going to the movies, sporting events to protesting?
really?

When we go to sporting events we pay for the tickets, when we go to the movies we pay for the movie, when we attend political rallies its to support whatever candidate vying for change legally and peacefully.

Protesting Wall street greed, or women marching with pink vagina hats and headgear is productive how? excluding conservative women and transgendered woman is productive how?

speaking of wall street some of those protesters were nasty individual, defecating in the park and such that the mayor had to shut it down for health reason, do you know what happens when humans defecate in a concentrated area?

If you dont look up Bombay and New Delhi India where this exists and read what happens.

while the tag of unproductive is unfair but the reality its most of them are not productive people .

My son bought his car used. It's $360. Full coverage insurance is $175. I don't buy laundry detergent every week but I buy something besides food every week. If you don't, then you are living in a home where someone else is buying the necessities. Because handsoap, paper towels, lysol, and maybe even some hand lotion on an occasion is normal. Milk is almost $4 a gallon. What the heck are you two eating? You left no budget for her new tires, oil changes, clothes, dining out, activities, make-up, hair cuts, or enough to budget a day off to go to a Neo-nazi rally.

And? How does any of that change the FACT That any time spent ANY WHERE but work cannot tell you if a person works , whatever event you see them at.


people go to the movies on dates that pay. People go to the movies that are on welfare or some other assistance. People who arent working to the movies with child support or alimony payments.

there is no factual evidence to determine what is 'in reality' for most of them

anymore than we know 'most' festival or rally goers are 'not productive people'

Did you not like tulips msharmony?

Wow....lol. You are talking about people going to movies who are on welfare and it doesn't occur to you that they should be focused on getting their life together.

I'm trying to think of how to explain it to you. Add up all the welfare these people receive. And I do mean all the benefits. Then add up how long a person would have to work to pay for it. Then add those hours to a productive members of society schedule.

Again with the cherry picking Miss harmony.

if one is on welfare they are being subsidized by tax payers, you know people that pays taxes, welfare people shouldn't be going to the movies unless someone is inviting them and paying for them, but if they are paying for it out of their welfare cheque that to me means they have disposable income or they are not very good at prioritizing their finances even though they are on welfare.

Women receiving child support or alimony is none of anyone business how they spend their money, its not tax payers money.

By the way if a person on welfare is at a sporting event with tickets they paid for I would question the welfare system period.

Yes, I started a tongue in cheek thread about the oval office for us last night in the coffee section, trouble is I think people think it's true

tsk, tsk, tsk. Good think I dont care for coffee ... but I bet your flowers were gorgeous ...