whats BS is that a cop ACTUALLY being assaulted can make an arrest without killing someone, yet a cop who sees someone RUNNING away doesnt see an option but to use lethal force.
that doesnt matter WHERE one is at, assault is assault, and running is running.
sorry but facts are facts, you praise the police in Racine County Wisc, for not using lethal force when you dont understand that in that city there aren't a lot of homicides to start off with
http://www.city-data.com/crime/crime-Racine-Wisconsin.html
ooops facts
Here is a major story from Racine County this year, 9 charged in firing paintball bullets at pedestrians ( see below)
https://www.cbs58.com/news/two-suspects-now-charged-after-allegedly-firing-paintball-gun-at-pedestrians-homes-in-racine
Compared to what police deal with in Pittsburgh , see below an article I found out of 114 homicides in 2015, 91 of them were black folks.
https://newpittsburghcourieronline.com/2016/01/08/91-of-114-homicides-black-lives-2015-deadliest-year-since-2008/
you have to compares apples to apples not apples to oranges
no, not apples to apples
is an assault in beverly hills somehow not the same as an assault in detroit? If Im carrying a gun, is someone struggling with me in Beverly Hills less of a threat than someone struggling with me in Detroit? SHould I make that assumption, really?
The action is the same, regardless of the location, so its not 'apples to oranges'