It is all over the political discussions in in the political rhetoric, one only has to listen closer.
in the idea that people on the one end(poverty) should have only scraps to motivate them to produce more msharmony
they should motivate themselves if they want to get out of poverty, many have.
but the people on the other end(wealth) should receive bonus after bonus and perk after perk in order to motivate them to produce moremsharmony
it works though.
in the idea that people's lives are expendable based upon how 'fearful' other people feel of them in a confrontation coupled with how much more likely it is for the system to forgive, overlook or adequately defend the wealthy and their crimes than they are the poor and theirs msharmony
you mean like how the 68 year old woman in Chicago riding the subway who was suckered punch by a thug and has lost her vision
you mean how the woman in Dallas Texas stopping in for gas with her two young children in the back seat only to be car jacked, luckily she had a gun, or are these outliers?
in the idea that anyone who cannot pay for the IMAGE of perfect morality, should be subject and expendable to the police state
the underlying classist system of protections and praise and 'merit' branding for the haves
and the simultaneous system of harsh and strict standards for everyone else, and the image that they arent doing or giving ENOUGH, and dont have 'merit' as much as those who have enough or more than enough
these things are NEVER framed as the haves and the have nots, but that is how their benefits and obstacles end up breaking down ...msharmony
Who said life is fair, such is life.. here is something Msharmony, why dont we tell people to obey the law, it works for all citizens.
I had an argument with someone who said to me Eric Garner did not deserve to die, and I agreed, but I added perhaps if Eric wasnt selling bootleg cigarettes you know "breaking the law" he might not have been in that situation.
Plus he could have lost some weight perhaps try what Oprah was pushing