life has no need to exist.
It doesn't and if left to nature it won't.
Nature will kill you if it gets a chance.
God felt the need to create this vast universe.
How do you know?
How do YOU know God "Needed" anything?
Another assumption?
Why create a vast universe but not create life?
So you have a question and immediately apply your own assumption as the answer.
Typical.
And if the universe being created hinges on life also being created
Who told you the Universe hinges on life?
Who told you the Universe "hinges" on anything?
Like Reality, The Universe Just Is.
It doesn't care, It needs no justification or glory.
No more than a rock in your yard needs anything to be a rock, it just is.
God intended it to be
Again, how can you "know" God intended anything?
Are to privy to its understanding of everything, everywhere, everywhen?
Pretty bold.
why would not God want to be a part or be known to his creation of life
This reasoning only has merit if one knows the mind of God.
How can anyone know the mind of God or if God even has a mind?
Isn't it easier to just accept reality as it is and stop trying to force it to select parameters?
Obviously, somewhere in the process of God's mind (who being the ultimate architect, engineer, scientist, mathematician, developer) wanted this vast universe.
Another assumption.
Human minds have reasoning so we attempt to understand reality using reason.
We think God must be the ultimate architect, engineer, scientist, mathematician, developer because we are unable to rectify reality without the reasoning factor. Consider that we are the result of a chain reaction in an unreasonable reality in which we specify reason according to our own understanding of the reality in which we experience. We define the reasoning for something that exists beyond our understanding and when it doesn't fit into our predefined little boxes it must be divine.
But, its all just the natural chain reaction of reality.
So, it would seem viable
To some it does.
To some it doesn't.
What all seem to fail to understand is to reality, it doesn't matter at all.
Again, I understand that some minds find comfort in religion and I have no problem with that if y'all are content.
Where the problems arise is when you try to tell me what I believe is wrong just so you can feel justified.
Its the inability of religion to consider any idea that is not doctrine.
If it were based on personal experience I would understand but to fight, kill and main based on a non-experienced belief is insanity in my book.
I offer alternative ideas on reality and God yet I am wrong without experience to make me wrong.
Yet I experience reality and I know the Universe is a chaotic chain reaction and life in nothing more than an accident of circumstance.
Perhaps when someone dies, a star should explode?
That would be significant, but wait.
People are not the only forms of life we know.
Perhaps when any life dies, a star should explode?
A plant, a worm, a fly, a bacterium?
Perhaps when a life ends a star is born?
We all know from history that when a dragon died a star was born.
Why dragons?
Why not chipmunks?