Still waiting for a photo of 'the edge' and stories of happens to people who 'fall off'. Curious that the media have never, ever, produced any such picture or story!

A quote from the flat earth society:

Is flat earth theory connected to a religion?

Flat earth theory is neither officially nor unofficially associated with any religion. Throughout the ages various religious institutions have championed a flat earth model for the world. Unfortunately this leaves us with the vestigial thought that flat earth theory and religions are symbiotic. They are not, even though many religions today, both mainstream and otherwise, still teach its followers that the world is flat. While they are not incorrect, believing in a flat earth isn't contingent upon believing in a deity or being a part of any religion.

A quote from the flat earth society:

Is flat earth theory connected to a religion?

Flat earth theory is neither officially nor unofficially associated with any religion. Throughout the ages various religious institutions have championed a flat earth model for the world. Unfortunately this leaves us with the vestigial thought that flat earth theory and religions are symbiotic. They are not, even though many religions today, both mainstream and otherwise, still teach its followers that the world is flat. While they are not incorrect, believing in a flat earth isn't contingent upon believing in a deity or being a part of any religion.

Please provide proof.

Not links.

Not books.

Not youtube videos.

But your own proof. From you. Nobody else.

Provide a thorough logical analysis, using the laws of logic.

Don't show us name-calling or subjective assumptions about people you don't even know.

You need to get away from your computer more and quit diving down those deep dark rabbit hole
You must have hit your head on the way down one
Get on a plane and take a trip then tell me the earth is flat.

it's common sense... pure simple physics.. observable testable and repeatable
I have posted plenty of leads for you to vet out... now get busy

And you completely dodged the request.

How utterly predictable.

The only conclusion to be drawn from this is that YOU have no PERSONAL proof or observations. Only the "hearsay" of others.

I'm sorry, but the BURDEN OF EVIDENCE falls upon you, not us. You are the one trying to change common belief.

You say it's so obvious and easy, yet you have furnished NONE OF YOUR OWN PROOF.

Typical brainwashing tactics.

‘This report derives and defines a set of linearized system matrices for a rigid aircraft of constant mass, flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat, nonrotating earth.’

Here is another government document, this time from the FAA, entitled …

that makes a Flat Earth reference.

On page 32, It states …

So in other words, for all intents and purposes, unless you are traveling at above Mach 3, or intend to travel into low Earth orbit or higher, then you should just consider the earth to be flat.

But if the Earth was truly curved then this would not work.

For example if you were flying from Sydney, on the east coast of Australia to Perth in Western Australia you would have to travel a distance of 2034 miles.

The alleged Earth curvature over that distance should be 522.37 miles. That means that unless the pilot constantly dipped the nose of the plane down towards the ground as he flew, by the time he reached Perth he would be flying at an altitude of 522.37 miles or 2,758,113 feet higher than he should be!

This fact alone proves the EARTH IS FLAT!

You can download the document directly from the FAA here.

https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/ang/offices/tc/about/campus/faa_host/labs/tgf/media/AircraftDynamicsModel.pdf

Not even close to what that report is saying.

Anything under Mach 3 cannot escape gravity, and therefore effectively follows a linear trajectory because they fly at a specific cruising altitude.

Meanwhile, craft that can achieve sub-orbital, orbital, or even escape velocities follow a ballistic trajectory like ICBMs, rockets, or the space shuttle.

Back in the 1980s, Lockheed was developing a ballistic airliner that could go from NYC to LA in 45 minutes. Why would they waste billions of dollars in R&D if they were privy to proof of a Flat Earth?