jaish's photo

jaish

Fri 05/10/19 08:05 AM




Status:
The World has completely stopped on Iranian Oil (80% of Iran’s exports).

Additional sanctions are now applied; on Metals.

Further, the USS Abraham Lincoln is now in the Gulf seas

W/o taking sides with Trump or Rouhani can we tell how this will unravel in next few months ?

--xx--

Just so that we are all on the same page:

From Recent History: No doubt that as the civil war in Syria 2011-12 turned in favor of the majority of the citizens and Assad was looking for a dignified exit, Russia propped him up and then ISIS trooped in. ISIS manpower was from Iraq and ideology of an Islamic Caliphate, from Iran.

From Ancient History: Back in the 80s, USA supported the Shah of Iran; (equivalent to supporting Assad of Syria). When the Shah was deposed by the Ayatollah Revolution, USA was caught off guard. Naturally, the Iranians viewed USA as part of the oppressor’s regime.


From New York Times:
European officials have been the most critical of Mr. Trump’s approach, arguing that as long as the Iranians were remaining faithful to their commitments — as international inspectors attested — there was no basis for reimposing sanctions. They have also pointed to Iran’s compliance in shipping 97 percent of its nuclear fuel out of the country as helpful in curbing Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.



Now in Trump’s Times.

Under John R. Bolton, the national security adviser who has long advocated pressing for regime change in Iran, the White House has been urging ever-escalating sanctions.


The Great Game is on.

Edited by jaish on Fri 05/10/19 08:12 AM
no photo

nickistaken

Fri 05/10/19 08:26 AM

The situation is far too complex to deal with in short posts. The game has been "on" for a long time. Another chapter opens...
jaish's photo

jaish

Fri 05/10/19 09:21 AM


The situation is far too complex to deal with in short posts. The game has been "on" for a long time. Another chapter opens...


understand the complexities of the past and political stakes; needless to re-raise them here.

To look onto the future we need to think of it as a game. It then seems we don't see a happy ending. Like N. Korea. NK had big brother China standing by.

Iran's response has been to ask EU to intervene. Given 60 days, till July 2nd.


EU's response (a day ago)


The European Union has rejected Iran's 60-day "ultimatum", referring to Tehran's decision to quit parts of the 2015 nuclear agreement a year after the US withdrew from the landmark accord signed with major world powers.

In a joint statement with the foreign ministries of France, the United Kingdom, and Germany, the EU urged Iran to respect the nuclear deal, and said it regretted new US sanctions imposed on Tehran.


In other words Iran will have to 'be more patient'
Edited by jaish on Fri 05/10/19 09:32 AM
no photo

nickistaken

Fri 05/10/19 10:30 AM

It's treated like a game by some, for sure. And it's bigger than many realize. I remember a particular simple minded American leader who scoffed and said "Iran is a threat? Iran is a tiny country!" Thankfully no one that naive is dealing with them now.
no photo

The Wrong Alice

Fri 05/10/19 02:38 PM

It was us the British who put Saddam in power I think.
We were happy to turn a blind eye, as he apparently kept other forces at bay
And I suppose there were various backhanders on oil deals
But then he got too big for his boots, pushed his luck too far, and bit the hand that fed him, so bye bye Saddam
I suspect a similar thing here, sort of, only Trump ain't getting the deal he wants, I suppose
And these things will simply continue in these mineral and oil rich countries
We'll allow somebody to get away with loads of stuff, all the while pretending we don't. Then point our finger and say how terrible they are
This will probably happen as long as we use fossil fuels that we don't need.
As for the Russia / China / Isis elements to this equation. I really don't know. I just know that it makes me sad, and that I don't like politics.
And that it's all a sort of Dr Strange Love scenario
Where the doomsaday device that can destroy us all, is there to keep us safe
Even if you don't go to that extreme, it's who's got the biggest guns, whose got the most guns, who's got the most soldiers
All of this to keep us safe
From them
The bogeyman
Not us, we're the good guys
Like I say, my knowledge isn't great, but I just don't buy into it
jaish's photo

jaish

Sat 05/11/19 12:44 AM


It was us the British who put Saddam in power I think.

I suspect a similar thing here, sort of, only Trump ain't getting the deal he wants, I suppose

... it's who's got the biggest guns, whose got the most guns, who's got the most soldiers



On first point, let me ask for how many generations are the Brits going to remain encumbered in the past?

On second point, yes. It is not clear what Trump is demanding from the existing nuclear deal further, his twitter message to Rouhan; is strange. Sounds like a demand for unconditional surrender.

Your final point - yes, it is naked display of power
(this is Trump's way; whether people like it or not).
--xx--

Moving forward, the Question is what are the options Iran has, and US reactions to them.

Because, as of now, it is between US and Iran:

Europe is not allied with US on this.

China wants to leverage on this renegotiate the tariffs.

India has no say.

And Iran is not a Country that will bend on her knees.

-Stalemate!!
no photo

Redrider1500

Sat 05/11/19 06:03 AM


It was us the British who put Saddam in power I think.
We were happy to turn a blind eye, as he apparently kept other forces at bay
And I suppose there were various backhanders on oil deals
But then he got too big for his boots, pushed his luck too far, and bit the hand that fed him, so bye bye Saddam
I suspect a similar thing here, sort of, only Trump ain't getting the deal he wants, I suppose
And these things will simply continue in these mineral and oil rich countries
We'll allow somebody to get away with loads of stuff, all the while pretending we don't. Then point our finger and say how terrible they are
This will probably happen as long as we use fossil fuels that we don't need.
As for the Russia / China / Isis elements to this equation. I really don't know. I just know that it makes me sad, and that I don't like politics.
And that it's all a sort of Dr Strange Love scenario
Where the doomsaday device that can destroy us all, is there to keep us safe
Even if you don't go to that extreme, it's who's got the biggest guns, whose got the most guns, who's got the most soldiers
All of this to keep us safe
From them
The bogeyman
Not us, we're the good guys
Like I say, my knowledge isn't great, but I just don't buy into it



I call it "The bully mentality".

Fear me. Oooh and Ahh me because I'm smarter/stronger than you. Aren't you impressed with me?

Oh come now, get real. Wanna impress me? Make your citizens happy. Make their standard of living good. Instill pride in their country. Let them live without fear, or oppression. Make them WANT to stay in their country. How hard is that?

Plenty hard, from what we've seen. Quite a few aren't happy unless they see others struggle to live. It really doesn't say much for you, if everyone hates your guts, and want to leave.

I'm not fond of bullies. Give me a chance, I'll lower one. Don't tell me what to do, I won't do it to you. You live, I live.


Just for a minute, lets say Iran drops its nuclear program. What would happen? Plenty. Money would rolling into their country, to buy their oil. They would get swamped in trading partners wanting to sell them goods. They'd need lots of workers to help them get their oil out. The workers would have money to spend. Gotta have places to spend their money. Well, shoot, no buildings to do it in. Build them. More workers to do the work. More folks with money to spend. Prosperity goes crazy. People get happy. Life gets good.

In a short amount of time, Iran becomes a place that people want to be at. Who wouldn't want to live in a prosperous country? Shows just one thing.

Their leaders are idiots.
jaish's photo

jaish

Sat 05/11/19 08:46 AM


Just for a minute, lets say Iran drops its nuclear program. What would happen? Plenty. Money would rolling into their country, to buy their oil...

Their leaders are idiots.


Last line - hilarious.

But R2D2 is right when he says US support for Shah (ending 1989) is similar to UK's propping up of Saddam.

Question is: Why is it that even today, US continues to support monarchies in Middle Eastern Arab countries?
--xx--

Oil:
Texas has run out of oil; the new guzzle is from fracking .




Low Octane: The Surprising Reason Shale Oil Makes a Poor Fuel for High-Tech Cars and Trucks

For financially troubled shale drillers, that's bad news, since it suggests demand for their oil could fall even if the price of a higher-octane oil barrel rises.


in 2017 / 18, US tried to push their oil to India after Trump - Modi meet; but was rejected after first few shipments by the refineries here, citing 'low' quality. Texas oil they said is too 'sweet'; requirement was for 'bitter' cause we are much more dependent on rails and trucks; they run on diesel.

Edited by jaish on Sat 05/11/19 09:06 AM
jaish's photo

jaish

Tue 05/21/19 08:58 AM


"Trump is 'crazy', says Iran's Director of Foreign Affairs for the country's parliament, Hossein Amir-Abdollahian (CNN)

Mr Hossein's remark comes after Mr Trump in a series of tweets on Sunday asked Iran "never to threaten" the US and warned Tehran that if it wants a fight, it would be "the official end" of the Islamic nation.

"In his mind, Mr Trump thinks he has a gun to Iran's head with sanctions and he is trying to shut down our economy," Amir-Abdollahian said. "This is all in his imagination. Now he wants us to call him? This is a crazy president."

"Mr Trump can discuss talking to Iran through a phone when he does not use the language of threat and force," he told CNN. "He can talk about phoning us when he goes back to the nuclear agreement."

--xx--

Shortly after Mr Hossein's interview, US president Donald Trump doubled down on the mixed messages by denying the US is trying to talk to Tehran at all.

"Fake News put out a typically false statement, without any knowledge that the United States was trying to set up a negotiation with Iran. This is a false report," Mr Trump tweeted on Monday.

"Iran will call us if and when they are ever ready. In the meantime, their economy continues to collapse - very sad for the Iranian people."

Mr Trump added that if Iran called, "We would certainly negotiate, I only want them to call if they're ready."



The boys want to talk, but don't want to call first.

and so preliminary negotiations are likely to continue over Twitter.
jaish's photo

jaish

Tue 05/28/19 09:39 AM

Today's press meet, Trump clarifies that: let Iran call and we will negotiate.
No nuclear weapons & that he wants Iran to be a prosperous country.


Just for a minute, lets say Iran drops its nuclear program. What would happen? Plenty. Money would rolling into their country, to buy their oil...

Their leaders are idiots.


:thumbsup:

Trump was also specific about John Kerry. Says it's Kerry advising the Iranians.

... It's an old line but matter is what exactly is Mr. Kerry advising.
Edited by jaish on Tue 05/28/19 09:46 AM
jaish's photo

jaish

Fri 05/31/19 07:31 AM



This year, from being an importer of crude oil, USA has become a net exporter.


Doesn't make sense if gasoline prices are $3 plus, per gallon unless...
Edited by jaish on Fri 05/31/19 07:39 AM
jaish's photo

jaish

Fri 05/31/19 07:56 AM



The USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group, which consists of carrier, air wing (fighters), B 52 bombers, one cruiser, two destroyers ..are positioned in the Persian Gulf.

Reason, 'These assets are in place in response to clear indications that Iran forces are preparing to attack US forces in the region'.


???




Edited by jaish on Fri 05/31/19 07:57 AM
jaish's photo

jaish

Sun 06/02/19 11:55 AM



Shinjo Abe is likely to meet Rouhani (President) and A A Khamenei (Supreme Leader) on June 12 to mediate between Washington and Tehran. Earlier in Tokyo, Trump has announced that ‘We are not looking for regime change; only at Iran achieving nuclear power status’. - Times of India


Iran, the ball is now in your court.
jaish's photo

jaish

Sat 06/08/19 06:53 AM



7 June 2019: Iran’s petrochemical industry in now under sanctions.

“By targeting this network we intend to deny funding to key elements of Iran’s petrochemical sector that provide support to the IRGC,” Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said in a statement



It began with oil and then metal exports and since yesterday it's the downstream petrochemicals. So if any of us had doubts on how serious Trump is, this finally clears it.

Jan 2018 Back then when oil sanctions were first imposed the response from world community was:

Russia called Trump's remarks "extremely negative." China said the deal now faces "complicating factors." And the European Union said it would "assess" the implication


With Brexit peaking, Europe may have even less of an opinion on this round of sanctions and seems Trump is leveraging on this, a hustler's tactics.
jaish's photo

jaish

Thu 06/13/19 02:37 PM


13 June 2019: Second mishap in Gulf of Oman

A crude oil tanker owned by Norway-based Frontline
and another carrying naphtha, managed by a Singapore or Japanese company
both ships suffered damage.




This, on day of Shinzo Abe's visit!!

SHINZO ABE hoped this was a moment for diplomacy. His visit to Tehran this week, the first by a Japanese prime minister since the Islamic revolution in 1979, was meant to reduce tensions between America and Iran. After a meeting with Iran’s president, Hassan Rouhani, Mr Abe warned that the region could “accidentally” slip into conflict. And then, a few miles off Iran’s southern coast, came an illustration of how that might happen.


LUNG1954's photo

LUNG1954

Tue 06/18/19 08:55 AM






From Recent History: No doubt that as the civil war in Syria 2011-12 turned in favor of the majority of the citizens and Assad was looking for a dignified exit, Russia propped him up and then ISIS trooped in. ISIS manpower was from Iraq and ideology of an Islamic Caliphate, from Iran.



Who Supports The Islamic State (ISIS)? Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Qatar, Israel, UK, France, USA
By Prof. Tim Anderson
The Infographics is by Professor Tim Anderson
It summarizes detailed information regarding the ISIS, which is contained in a forthcoming book entitle The Dirty War on Syria
The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Prof. Tim Anderson, Global Research, 2015
http://www.globalresearch.ca/who-supports-the-islamic-state-isis-saudi-arabia-turkey-qatar-uk-france-usa/5490271
The ISIS Islamic Terrorists are Supported by the US, Israel and Saudi Arabia
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-isis-islamic-terrorists-are-supported-by-the-us-israel-and-saudi-arabia/5396171
jaish's photo

jaish

Tue 06/18/19 09:01 PM


Hello Lung,
nice to see you back.

I think a debate on ISIS, whether 'from Saudi Arabia' or Iran hardly matters anymore with Syria ruined. It now appears that there are much more immigrant Muslims in Syria bolstering Assad's Rule than ever before.

In my non-Islamic view, the difference between Iran and Saudi is that the Saudi's continue to have a King while Iran threw their's out.

anyway, if the Sanctions force Iran to completely give up their foreign policy of encouraging aggression (without a shot being fired) I think it would be a great achievement in our times.

Unfortunately, Trump is looking at costs and his patience is running out.

Latest:
Acting US Defence Secretary Patrick Shanahan announced the deployment of 1,000 more troops to the Middle East for what he said were defensive purposes, citing concerns about a threat from Iran.

The new US deployment is in addition to a 1,500-troop increase announced last month in response to tanker attacks. — Reuters

LUNG1954's photo

LUNG1954

Wed 06/19/19 01:04 AM

Why didn’t America force Israel to stop killing Palestinians and didn’t force Saudi Arabia to stop war against Yemen's people via Sanctions?!
LUNG1954's photo

LUNG1954

Wed 06/19/19 05:27 AM



13 June 2019: Second mishap in Gulf of Oman

A crude oil tanker owned by Norway-based Frontline
and another carrying naphtha, managed by a Singapore or Japanese company
both ships suffered damage.
After a meeting with Iran’s president, Hassan Rouhani, Mr Abe warned that the region could “accidentally” slip into conflict. And then, a few miles off Iran’s southern coast, came an illustration of how that might happen.


Elsewhere, U.S. allies met the Trump administration’s insistence on Iranian perfidy with caution and even skepticism. “The video is not enough,” German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas told reporters. “We can understand what is being shown, sure, but to make a final assessment, this is not enough for me.”
jaish's photo

jaish

Fri 06/21/19 09:47 PM


Man orders air strikes then cancels them.

June 20th: On the basis of: Iran shooting down an American surveillance drone over the Strait of Hormuz. Iran claims the aircraft was flying over its territorial waters, while America insists it was above international waters.

Trump had then declared that Iran had made a “big mistake”,

Now, he is downplaying. “I find it hard to believe it was intentional,” he said before a meeting with the Canadian prime minister, Justin Trudeau. The president suggested that a “stupid” Iranian officer could have approved anti-aircraft fire without the approval of his superiors.


Really Donald?

the World has been watching your boys shooting at tankers (6 so far); what's a small drone relatively?

[An Iranian lady (interviewed on the net over the economic hardship) says it's like two school boys fighting.

I do hope it ends that way. But where the heck is the headmaster?]


Edited by jaish on Fri 06/21/19 09:48 PM