Topic: Kyle Rittenhouse: guilty of murder?
Reply
Mr Good Guy's photo

Mr Good Guy

Fri 11/19/21 10:20 AM



The people that approached the kid did so because he just shot and killed someone. The person he shot was already down when the kid shot him 3 more times. It was the kids actions that created the situation. You can’t claim self defense for a situation you created. None of his actions were reasonable and had he just not had the gun and went around administering medical assistance like he said he was there to do none of this would have happened.
Evidently you CAN claim self defense for a situation one creates. Your loose claim here was the same claim the prosecution tried to use. Fail. Verdict: Not Guilty. Well done
Edited by Mr Good Guy on Fri 11/19/21 10:24 AM
Bart's photo

Bart

Fri 11/19/21 10:31 AM




The people that approached the kid did so because he just shot and killed someone. The person he shot was already down when the kid shot him 3 more times. It was the kids actions that created the situation. You can’t claim self defense for a situation you created. None of his actions were reasonable and had he just not had the gun and went around administering medical assistance like he said he was there to do none of this would have happened.
Evidently you CAN claim self defense for a situation one creates. Your loose claim here was the same claim the prosecution tried to use. Fail. Verdict: Not Guilty. Well done
Justice Served. Totally Vindicated. This is how our justice system is supposed to work.
Bastet127's photo

Bastet127

Fri 11/19/21 10:45 AM





The people that approached the kid did so because he just shot and killed someone. The person he shot was already down when the kid shot him 3 more times. It was the kids actions that created the situation. You can’t claim self defense for a situation you created. None of his actions were reasonable and had he just not had the gun and went around administering medical assistance like he said he was there to do none of this would have happened.
Evidently you CAN claim self defense for a situation one creates. Your loose claim here was the same claim the prosecution tried to use. Fail. Verdict: Not Guilty. Well done
Justice Served. Totally Vindicated. This is how our justice system is supposed to work.


Hope you’re never in a similar situation where you’re defending a loved one, neighbor, whatever and are killed by an active shooter. :thumbsup:
Bart's photo

Bart

Fri 11/19/21 10:57 AM






The people that approached the kid did so because he just shot and killed someone. The person he shot was already down when the kid shot him 3 more times. It was the kids actions that created the situation. You can’t claim self defense for a situation you created. None of his actions were reasonable and had he just not had the gun and went around administering medical assistance like he said he was there to do none of this would have happened.
Evidently you CAN claim self defense for a situation one creates. Your loose claim here was the same claim the prosecution tried to use. Fail. Verdict: Not Guilty. Well done
Justice Served. Totally Vindicated. This is how our justice system is supposed to work.


Hope you’re never in a similar situation where you’re defending a loved one, neighbor, whatever and are killed by an active shooter. :thumbsup:
if that happens than I’m proud to die defending what is right. I won’t just ignore the danger and cower away. I’ll say it again the jury came to the only decision they could if going by the law. I hope if you are ever in a situation where someone is endangering your life that there is a someone there with a set of balls that they will stop that threat. That’s just another part of the American way.
Smartazzjohn's photo

Smartazzjohn

Fri 11/19/21 11:05 AM



The people that approached the kid did so because he just shot and killed someone. The person he shot was already down when the kid shot him 3 more times. It was the kids actions that created the situation. You can’t claim self defense for a situation you created. None of his actions were reasonable and had he just not had the gun and went around administering medical assistance like he said he was there to do none of this would have happened.


"It was the kids actions that created the situation." Really????

1)He didn't create the riot.
2)He didn't chase anyone, he was chased.
3)You are making assumptions about what would have happened if he didn't have a gun. It's not like the actions of rioters, especially ones with extensive criminal records, can be predicted.
4)If the rioters weren't there none of this would have happened.
5)If the police would have stopped the riots, ALL the riots, last summer most of the people who were hurt and most of the destruction wouldn't of happened.

There have been situations created by many mayors that criminal behavior by criminal rioters would be acceptable. There have been situations created by many prosecutors that crimes like arson, looting and destruction of private property wouldn't be charged......and even when a person was charged the criminals knew they would be let out of jails in a few hours without posting bail.

My hope is that this case sends a message to rioters and criminals that their malfeasance will no longer be tolerated and that law abiding people CAN defend themselves and their property.
Bart's photo

Bart

Fri 11/19/21 11:19 AM

This young man has been through so much of a traumatic episode, he took the stand to defend his own caricature, amidst all the lying slanderous fake media peddlers . His life will always be defined by the actions of a few thugs thanks to our president and his kind of “people”. I hope the lawsuits go out soon against the fools that try to convict before the facts came out.
Bastet127's photo

Bastet127

Fri 11/19/21 11:36 AM

Guys, I am a gun owner and support the 2nd amendment, and I know how to shoot. America is a great country and I believe in our justice system, the jury decided and that’s that. No need to attack me or my beliefs, it is after all, a free country.
Bastet127's photo

Bastet127

Fri 11/19/21 11:42 AM




The people that approached the kid did so because he just shot and killed someone. The person he shot was already down when the kid shot him 3 more times. It was the kids actions that created the situation. You can’t claim self defense for a situation you created. None of his actions were reasonable and had he just not had the gun and went around administering medical assistance like he said he was there to do none of this would have happened.


"It was the kids actions that created the situation." Really????

1)He didn't create the riot.
2)He didn't chase anyone, he was chased.
3)You are making assumptions about what would have happened if he didn't have a gun. It's not like the actions of rioters, especially ones with extensive criminal records, can be predicted.
4)If the rioters weren't there none of this would have happened.
5)If the police would have stopped the riots, ALL the riots, last summer most of the people who were hurt and most of the destruction wouldn't of happened.

There have been situations created by many mayors that criminal behavior by criminal rioters would be acceptable. There have been situations created by many prosecutors that crimes like arson, looting and destruction of private property wouldn't be charged......and even when a person was charged the criminals knew they would be let out of jails in a few hours without posting bail.

My hope is that this case sends a message to rioters and criminals that their malfeasance will no longer be tolerated and that law abiding people CAN defend themselves and their property.


It clearly wasn’t this cut and dry given it took the jury several days to reach a verdict.
Bart's photo

Bart

Fri 11/19/21 12:47 PM


Guys, I am a gun owner and support the 2nd amendment, and I know how to shoot. America is a great country and I believe in our justice system, the jury decided and that’s that. No need to attack me or my beliefs, it is after all, a free country.
I haven’t seen anybody attack you or your beliefs. We are just defending out beliefs. :v:I welcome the chance to debate.
Rock's photo

Rock

Fri 11/19/21 12:54 PM

NOT GUILTY!

Today, young Mr. Rittenhouse,
was found NOT GUILTY of all charges
by a jury of 12.

So's I can't be accused of political
bias with the link I source from,
I'll use the pinko Commie News Network
as a source.

http://www.cnn.com/us/live-news/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-verdict-watch-11-19-21/index.html
Bastet127's photo

Bastet127

Fri 11/19/21 01:02 PM



Guys, I am a gun owner and support the 2nd amendment, and I know how to shoot. America is a great country and I believe in our justice system, the jury decided and that’s that. No need to attack me or my beliefs, it is after all, a free country.
I haven’t seen anybody attack you or your beliefs. We are just defending out beliefs. :v:I welcome the chance to debate.


Fair enough! :thumbsup:
dust4fun's photo

dust4fun

Fri 11/19/21 05:41 PM


http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/george-floyd-full-autopsy-report-reveals-cause-of-death/ACAFYGEMTJCC3XMCBNFBE6W3XA/

Just because it fits your narrative...it does not make it fact Dust4fun.

.

Ya, and O.J. didn't kill Ron Goldburg and Nicole Brown....the jury always gets it right? At least Bidden said the jury has spoken in the Rittenhouse case and he stands by that.

As far as that article it is not an autopsy, it just a news report. I have read both official autopsies and he had enough fentanyl in him to kill a horse. Heart attack from someone kneeling on your back, don't think so. He was higher then a kite when he passed the fake $20, then when the cop came to the window of his car he shoved all the drugs he had in his mouth, he did the same thing a year prior when he was stopped. He was also bought to the hospital a couple months prior for an "overdose". Break it down "over" "dose", that means took too many drugs. Do you think he would have acted that way if he was not on drugs? Then he probably took too many and it lead to his death. He said "I can't bweave" before they evehad him in the cop car or on the ground. The cops job was to restrain him to keep him from harming himself or other til the ambulance arrived but apparently they weren't even paramedics because they had to wait for the fire department. The only thing that may have saved his life is Narcan but they didn't know what he was on or how much he took. Maybe we should start throwing doctors in prison too every time they get something wrong?
Bart's photo

Bart

Sat 11/20/21 05:24 AM

The media melt down of a just verdict is horrendous. After 4 days of deliberation determined that a young man acted in self defense the fake news propaganda spreaders show their true caricature by defending the child rapist that tried to kill this young man. One of the scumbags that got what he deserved raped 5 boys between the ages of 9 and 11. Now he’s a good scumbag( a dead one) . The MSM scum should be banned from spreading their lies and immorality’s over the airways. How long before the democrats erect a statue of rosenbaughm( the child molester) they are portraying him as a hero. Says a lot about the caricature of democrats.
Edited by Bart on Sat 11/20/21 06:20 AM
Bob Just Bob's photo

Bob Just Bob

Mon 12/27/21 05:35 PM

Rittenhoyse is a bootlicking cop worshipper who likes to hit girls. it's a damn shame he didn't get smoked too.
jaish's photo

jaish

Wed 12/29/21 11:20 PM


The media melt down ...

How long before the democrats erect a statue of rosenbaughm( the child molester) they are portraying him as a hero. Says a lot about the caricature of democrats.


Case surpassed epic levels when Judge Bruce Schroeder had the gumption to ban MSNBC.

What luck, the cop flagging down the reporter because he did not stop at the red light!!!

The guy following the bus was keeping himself a block behind the bus.

The cop should have handcuffed the reporter pending investigations - nevertheless he's a hero.

And then the fake news:
NBC News said in a statement that he was a freelancer and he "never contacted or intended to contact the jurors during deliberations, and never photographed or intended to photograph them."


Even the media agrees, 'It can't get fokker than this.'

As far as the suggestion goes:

How long before the democrats erect a statue of rosenbaughm ...


Why not?
Edited by jaish on Thu 12/30/21 12:08 AM
Dan's photo

Dan

Thu 01/06/22 07:43 AM

Probably not as much as the verdict.
Mr Good Guy's photo

Mr Good Guy

Thu 01/06/22 07:49 AM


Rittenhoyse is a bootlicking cop worshipper who likes to hit girls. it's a damn shame he didn't get smoked too.
[/quote

Bob just Bob: Dumb just Dumb
Edited by Mr Good Guy on Thu 01/06/22 07:50 AM
Bart's photo

Bart

Thu 01/06/22 12:01 PM













Edited by Bart on Thu 01/06/22 12:08 PM
Bart's photo

Bart

Thu 01/06/22 12:02 PM



Rittenhoyse is a bootlicking cop worshipper who likes to hit girls. it's a damn shame he didn't get smoked too.
[/quote

Bob just Bob: Dumb just Dumb

:thumbsup: