So here’s what I got so far:
- There are two different types of vibrations: the “outgoing” type and the “incoming” type.
- We create the “outgoing” type but cannot create the “incoming” type
- The Universe creates the “incoming” type
Is that right so far?
*All vibrations are generated (sent or outgoing) or they are incoming to the sender.
I don't know if I would call them two different "types" of vibrations. They are simply vibrations sent and received. Everything that exists vibrates with a unique frequency.
You give off vibrations, they are outgoing from you. You don't vibrate for anyone else, so no, you don't create incoming vibrations.
Incoming vibrations come from everywhere else.
(You can call it "The Universe" if you want.)
If we hope to understand much about the physical workings of the universe, then, we need to have some idea about the way that waves and vibrations work. The details of wave motion vary, but many of the principles are universal.
Ah, but by sending the outgoing waves, you are also creating the incoming waves. Because if not for you, they would not exist.
Which I know is like asking the smithy for some shoes for yer horse. Sure you didn't do the forging, but it wouldn't be if not for you. So technically, you've got as much to do with the forging, if not more.
Witches don't CREATE anything. They transform things. They are wizards of alchemy.
So witchcraft truly is quite a bit different from the Law of Attraction in many ways.
I disagree. I think that witches create moreso than attractionists. We tend to call upon things (elements, gods & goddesses, spirits...etc.) to imbue items with some form of potency. Thus we make things more than they are. A knife becomes an athame, a cup a chalice, a rock a gazing crystal.
Attracionists simply call things in existence to themselves.
A spell is just a more complex form of attraction. Rituals are unnecessary. They are, however, more powerful. Things not just of your will being implemented towards some common goal.
Science has no clue what energy is.
All science can tell you is how energy behaves.
Science can't tell you what a ball is either.
All it can tell you is how balls bounce.
Science doesn't explain what anything is. Science just sticks with explaining how things behave.
Period.
Some people will argue with this on a superfical level, claiming that science can indeed tell use what a ball is (i.e. it's made of rubber or whatever)
But that's truly superficial becasue in the end, science can't say what rubber is.
Well, if you believe in the
theory of relativity, Energy = Mass x (Speed of Light)Squared.
Science can tell you either where an electron is, or where it's going. Not both at once.
And of course science can tell you what rubber is. It's some lengthy compound comprised of various elements that I'm too lazy to go cut and paste. Science can even tell you what a "ball" is, or what "rubber" is. Linguistics is a science too. What you're describing is pretty much just the physics aspect of science.
Unperiod.
Edited by
ganonzyther
on Thu 12/11/08 01:25 AM