I don't believe that this controversy is ridiculous.
I routine get irked when minority entertainers are bypassed for awards when I believe that they deserve them.
I agree with you David. I don't think this issue is ridiculous at all . The reason why it isn't ridiculous is because there are too many cases of blatant racism in the world today for my people to NOT be suspicious at times when a merit list is published and none of our names are on it. Suspicion by my people in light of a history tainted with racial oppression is HUMAN . Many Caucasians continue to throw a blind eye to this history, but blindness does not make the existence of something any less REAL. I don't have an issue with my people being suspicious. Our history provokes a very visceral reaction in the way we see the world. ..BUT suspicions should not snowball into accusations before the relevant research is conducted and substantial evidence is acquired. To give more balance to this debate, I should have stated that I am.proud of Jada and Spike Lee for taking a proactive stand for diversity at the Oscars. Increased diversity is noble ideal to strive for, but I am concerned that their message is being lost because claims are being made without adequate substantiation thereby appearing like a sour grapes reaction to a personal Oscar snub.
And before I am dragged off my pulpit by the forum,

I want to raise the issue of fairness outside the context of racism. When Halle Berry won the academy award for best actress, I rejoiced heartily with her, but part of me wondered how come Angela Bassett or even Cicely Tyson,both highly celebrated black actresses did not receive that Oscar PRIOR to Hally Berry. They had been churning out flawless performances LONG before Halle stepped on my scene and it brings me back to my million dollar question.:
What is the criteria for nominations and wins at the Oscars???
Edited by
Unknow
on Mon 01/25/16 04:02 PM