Maybe it has to be in the three digits before they send in The National Guard.
Which should of been there over two years ago.
If they did this current thread most likely wouldn't exist.
It may, to justify the singling out of Chicago for the National guard.
Like I was saying before about raw numbers versus percentages. IF a town had 20000 and 5000 were killed, that would be much more impactful and worrisome than a town of 2 million having 10000 killed. sometimes as terrible as the raw numbers are, they are not adequate to compare relative need. Relying on military for one town opens the door to spreading them out across SEVERAL towns with need that is relatively equivalent or worse, to do a job that is supposed to be that of the police.
Making up your own Fictitious " worlds most deadly small towns" again? where 1 or of 4 residents are murdered each year. To make the 10,000 murdered in another fictitious city look....acceptable.
This is not a math exercise MS, This can not be explained away with numbers. This is and has been going on in Chicago for a very long time by well established deadly thug gangs with the gangster disciples at the top of the list. This is national news because it is unprecedented in any other large metro city.
So, please don't try to make it sound.. acceptable.. its not, not by any standard.
terrible misrepresentation of what was ACTUALLY posted.
nowhere did I say 'acceptable'. I actually called it 'terrible'. Im speaking only to the LEGAL and REALISTIC ramification and precedence. There is a very well known sentiment in AMerica that is this "If no one did it for me/us, they shouldnt do it for others."
To justify legally sending in the national guard for the violence in a town, OPENS UP AND LEGALLY JUSTIFIES, a requirement to send them in for violence in OTHER TOWNS if they are equally or more seriously impacted by violence.
The National Guard has missions. what would their MISSION be there? How long would that MISSION take to be complete? What would happen after they left?