Maybe it has to be in the three digits before they send in The National Guard.
Which should of been there over two years ago.
If they did this current thread most likely wouldn't exist.
It may, to justify the singling out of Chicago for the National guard.
Like I was saying before about raw numbers versus percentages. IF a town had 20000 and 5000 were killed, that would be much more impactful and worrisome than a town of 2 million having 10000 killed. sometimes as terrible as the raw numbers are, they are not adequate to compare relative need. Relying on military for one town opens the door to spreading them out across SEVERAL towns with need that is relatively equivalent or worse, to do a job that is supposed to be that of the police.
There is no singling out whatsoever.
As a matter of fact there is no comparison within the United States.
For anyone to think it isn't past time to send in The National Guard is just foolish to say the least.
Unless you don't mind the senseless murders that are going on there.
I mind them. But there is LOGIC that needs to be used instead of just a bandaid that may only postpone or make matters worse. If its going to be corrected, let it not be some temporary and fleeting show of brutality meeting brutality. there needs to be LEGALLY supported means employed with precedent or which will SET precedent.
In Chicago, 1,876 people have been shot this year. That is 473 fewer than 2017.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/data/ct-shooting-victims-map-charts-htmlstory.html
For the sheer number of victims of violent crime, no other city comes close. In 2015, Chicago recorded 478 homicides, more than in any other American city. New York, with 352 homicides, recorded the second-highest number of homicides, followed by Baltimore with 344. Almost everyone who was killed in Chicago that year — 93 percent — was shot to death.
But numbers offer a limited view of a city’s gun violence problem. Chicago, with roughly 2.7 million residents, is the third-most populous city in the country. On a per capita basis, its shooting epidemic is not nearly as severe as the violence in many other large American cities.
“The absolute numbers are helpful putting it in a context that people understand, but with the rates, you get the true scope of the problem in the way it impacts people’s lives,” John Pfaff, a professor of law at Fordham Law School, told The Trace. “People don’t care about the absolute numbers, they care about their risk, and the rates tell that risk.”
Chicago’s homicide rate over the last five years was 16.4 per 100,000 residents. In St. Louis and New Orleans, the homicide rate from 2010 to 2015 was three times as high, on average.
https://www.thetrace.org/2016/10/chicago-gun-violence-per-capita-rate/
SO.. like I was saying, sending in National Guard for CHICAGOS violence sets precedent to send them in to several others with a similar RATE of violence or worse. that is a dangerous precedent and wears the guard thin, as opposed to using police to do the job they are trained and paid to do.
Edited by
msharmony
on Sun 08/19/18 07:09 PM